| Pages: [1] |
1. When do we get the deployable tractoring thing? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Refitting on the mobile home is personal only, it doesn't care about fleets or corps or standings. I dont understand why you guys insist on calling the depot (which is a good and accurate name) a "mobile home" which it cl...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2013.11.02 22:46:00
|
2. [Rubicon] Interbus Ship Identification System feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Conjaqq wrote: CCP Ytterbium wrote: CCP RubberBAND wrote: such as the Moroes. It's Moros , you pathetic meatbag Not some kind of weird name made to rhythm with "oh noes here are the Moroes!" First saw you type that on an interna...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2013.10.25 18:55:00
|
3. [Rubicon] Interbus Ship Identification System feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP RubberBAND wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Ships you dont have the skills to fly should really be greyed out even if you have the necessary skills partially trained. Also. if you dont have the skills to fly a ship, any mastery Level is i...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2013.10.24 18:59:00
|
4. [Rubicon] Interbus Ship Identification System feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ships you dont have the skills to fly should really be greyed out even if you have the necessary skills partially trained. Also. if you dont have the skills to fly a ship, any mastery Level is irrelevant and shouldnt be displayed imo. Keep it clean.
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2013.10.24 02:15:00
|
5. Sticky:Singulariy: Database changes inbound - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Does this mean that the Rubicon features will be deployed back to Sisi only after this DB-test?
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2013.10.22 18:01:00
|
6. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Brunaburh wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Brunaburh wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Highsec entities a forced into wars without the diplo tools nullsec entities take for granted. Since when do Hisec entities not have the ability to us...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.13 10:42:00
|
7. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Brunaburh wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Highsec entities a forced into wars without the diplo tools nullsec entities take for granted. Since when do Hisec entities not have the ability to use chat, Skype, voice communications and negotia...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.13 00:06:00
|
8. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Elise Randolph wrote: On to your proposal - why does war have to be even? Fleet fights certainly are never even. Skillpoints between entities aren't even, ISK coffers aren't even, intangible experience isn't even. It seems arbitrary to say "he...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.12 23:32:00
|
9. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Fuujin wrote: Finde learth wrote: And why unlimited free allies was dumb if Balance a fight never really been the goal in EVE ? Because its just idiotic on its face? Parity, equality, level fairness is not a goal. Disallowing free warde...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.12 23:11:00
|
10. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Two step wrote: For the hundredth time, no, that is not the reason the changes are being made. I know your universe revolves entirely around yourself, but there are actually other people out there who are effected by the wardec changes. Allowi...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.12 22:30:00
|
11. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Soundwave wrote: Why would I want to balance a fight? That's never really been the goal in EVE and the war dec system wasn't built for that either. I understand that it's annoying when a big alliance war decs you, but that's hardly new to...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.12 22:09:00
|
12. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: All I said was that you aren't convincing me that Goons griefing people out of the game using predatory wardecs is a big enough problem to shape a mechanic around it. Oh please. This discussion should be about ho...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.12 21:32:00
|
13. Minmatar V3 on SISI. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Agreed, the generic T1 hullcolor is perhaps a tad too bright, T2 wise Core complexion ships look good, Boundless creation ships have a cool camofage and Thukker mix are also okay. But, what the HELL have you done to the Vaga? You have removed ...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.06.09 01:04:00
|
14. Public beta-test of Sisi launcher tool - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: LtCol Laurentius on 15/11/2010 19:32:22 The SISI Launcher worked for me when it was orgininally posted, but from the first update it has failed in every single iteration. It just terminate the update process after 2 seconds, so I ha...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2010.11.15 19:28:00
|
15. Apocrypha suggestions and feature requests - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Title: Ship Fitting * Category: UI * Description: The current iteration of the fitting screen has one major disadvatage: It is not - by any stretch of imagination - intuitive . And for this reason alone it is simply crap. Yes, the old fitting w...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2009.02.13 13:38:00
|
16. Apocrypha on Singularity delayed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: LtCol Laurentius on 06/02/2009 19:52:11 Rofl. You guys do realize that you just ruined the last training day for the teams competing in the 6th Tournament right? Dont you guys talk to eachother at all?
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2009.02.06 19:51:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |